Stephen Frink tests the Canon 14mm II
January 17, 2008 @ 02:00 AM (EST)
Photographer and Wetpixel member Stephen Frink borrowed a copy of the new 14mm II from Canon Professional Services to examine both topside and underwater performance and compare against the other popular wide angle lenses: the 16-35 II and 15mm fisheye.
Frink finds that “the new Canon 14mm II is much, much better than the original 14mm lens...and offers better corner performance than the 16-35 II.” Continue reading for the full review, which looks at angle of view and corner sharpness, chromatic aberration and flare resistance, and depth-of-field considerations for the new high-ISO cameras, and is complete with sample images...
Comments
Be the first to add a comment to this article.
You must be logged in to comment.
Related Content
August 6, 2011, 7:00AM
Keri Wilk, Matt Weiss, and Joe Tepper put the Canon S95 in FIX housing through its paces in Curacao more
March 15, 2011, 5:42PM
Join Steve De Neef, an accomplished underwater photography, as he takes the plunge into shooting video with his SLR. In this more
January 19, 2011, 1:00PM
William Tan goes through the settings needed to take great underwater photographs with your Canon G11, G12 or S90/S95 more
April 23, 2008, 2:00AM
Eric Cheng of Wetpixel posted a great review of the Sea & Sea MDX housing for the Canon 1D Mark III and 1Ds Mark III more
Sponsors
What's New
